I’ve had a look through the Lib Dem manifesto today, because of course I have. It’s long — something like three times as long as the larger parties’ — and full of detail (as someone — I’m afraid I can’t remember who — pointed out on Twitter, only the Lib Dems and the Greens have much in the way of detail in their manifestos, and this may be to do with the fact that they’re the only large parties whose policies are developed by the membership, so they *have* a lot of policy).
Most of the manifesto is, frankly, dull as ditchwater. A lot of it’s the same managerialist platitudes you’ll get in any manifesto, just with additional costings. EVERY party says they’ll protect the environment, cut crime, protect the NHS, and stroke puppies. So I’ve gone through and found the stuff that seems like it’s worth commenting on — mostly positively, but occasionally negatively. The stuff that seems distinctively liberal, or disappointingly not, not the rest. I’m also only looking here at stuff I have a clue about.
Liberal Democrats remain committed to introducing
Land Value Tax (LVT), which would replace Business Rates in
the longer term and could enable the reduction or abolition of
LVT is one of those ideas that Lib Dems seem to love, and that no-one else ever talks about. When I first heard about it, I thought “that makes so much sense, there *must* be a catch!”, but no-one’s ever pointed one out to me (which is not to say there isn’t one).
a new legally binding target to bring net greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050
Possibly too little too late, but *something* like this needs to be done…
As a major global economy, we must promote open markets and
free trade, both within the European Union and beyond. Only as
a full member of a reformed European Union can we be certain
Britain’s businesses will have access to markets in Europe and
Liberal Democrats believe we should welcome talented people
from abroad, encourage visitors and tourists who contribute
enormously to our economic growth, and give sanctuary to refugees
fleeing persecution. Immigration procedures must be robust and fair,
and the UK must remain open to visitors who boost our economy,
and migrant workers who play a vital role in business and public
A bit of a difference from mugs saying “controls on immigration”…
Protect the independence of the BBC while ensuring the Licence Fee does not rise faster than inflation, maintain Channel
4 in public ownership and protect the funding and editorial independence of Welsh language broadcasters
Sounds good, although it’s basically “we’ll leave this alone”.
Raise the Personal Allowance to at least £12,500, cutting your taxes by around £400 more
Nice idea in theory, not a priority I’m particularly keen on in the current economic climate.
Legislate to make the ‘triple lock’ permanent, guaranteeing decent pensions rises each year
Not keen on this either — the triple lock as a temporary measure is, and has been, a good thing. But making it permanent is to guarantee that an ever-increasing proportion of spending will go to pensions, regardless of need. I accept that I’m in a minority on this one though.
Extend free childcare to all two-year olds, and to the children of working families from the end of paid parental leave.
Expand Shared Parental Leave with a ‘use it or lose it’ month for fathers, and introduce a right to paid leave for carers
Both entirely good ideas.
Complete the introduction of Universal Credit (UC), so people are always better off in work.
In principle, UC is a very good idea. In practice, the implementation has been a complete balls-up so far. If the reforms that are talked about make it work better, then it might be a good thing. We’ll see.
Reductions in benefits may not always be the best
way to improve claimants’ compliance: those with chaotic lives
might be more successful in finding a job if they were directed to
targeted support with their problems. We will ensure there are no
league tables or targets for sanctions issued by Jobcentres and
introduce a ‘yellow card’ warning so people are only sanctioned if
they deliberately and repeatedly break the rules.
Nowhere near what I’d like, but a definite massive improvement on the current system.
Liberal Democrats will protect young people’s entitlements to the welfare safety net, while getting them the help they need to get their first job.
In other words, “bollocks to this idea of stopping benefits for under-25s that both Labour and the Tories have”
Introduce a 1% cap on the uprating of working-age benefits until the budget is balanced in 2017/18, after which they will rise with
inflation once again. Disability and parental leave benefits will be
exempt from this temporary cap.
I really, *really* don’t like the below-inflation benefits rise thing, when we’re promising to increase pensions at above inflation. On the other hand, there’s a definite term limit on this. Not something I support, but could be worse.
Withdraw eligibility for the Winter Fuel Payment and free
TV Licence from pensioners who pay tax at the higher rate
(40%). We will retain the free bus pass for all pensioners.
Sounds good to me. I’m right on the 40% tax rate border, and I manage to support two people, pay a mortgage, spend quite a lot of money on leisure pursuits, and put a reasonable amount away in savings every month. Anyone with more income than me (and who will be unlikely to still be making mortgage payments) doesn’t need free stuff paid for by people who are on average worse-off than them. (The bus pass is worth keeping because it encourages public transport use, which is a good thing in itself).
Ensure swift implementation of the new rules requiring companies with more than 250 employees to publish details of the different pay levels of men and women in their organisation. We will build on this platform and, by 2020, extend transparency requirements to include publishing the number of people paid less than the Living Wage and the ratio between top and median pay. We will also consult on
requirements for companies to conduct and publish a full equality pay review, and to consult staff on executive pay.
Ask the Low Pay Commission to look at ways of raising the National Minimum Wage, without damaging employment opportunities. We will improve enforcement action and clamp down on abuses by employers seeking to avoid paying the minimum wage by reviewing practices such as unpaid internships.
Establish an independent review to consult on how to set a fair Living Wage across all sectors. We will pay this Living Wage in all central government departments and their agencies from April 2016, and encourage other public sector employers to do likewise.
Improve the enforcement of employment rights, reviewing Employment Tribunal fees to ensure they are not a barrier. We will ensure employers cannot avoid giving their staff rights or paying the minimum wage by wrongly classifying them as workers or self-employed.
All very good stuff.
Conduct a review of the Work Capability Assessment and
Personal Independence Payment assessments to ensure they are fair, accurate and timely and evaluate the merits of a public sector provider.
Simplify and streamline back-to-work support for people with
disabilities, mental or physical health problems. We will aim for
the goal of one assessment and one budget for disabled and sick
people to give them more choice and control.
This is stuff that desperately needs doing.
Reform the policy to remove the spare room subsidy. Existing
social tenants will not be subject to any housing benefit
reduction until they have been offered reasonable alternative
accommodation. We will ensure tenants who need an extra bedroom for genuine medical reasons are entitled to one in any assessment of their Housing Benefit needs, and those whose homes are substantially adapted do not have their Housing Benefit reduced.
In other words, “we’re not going to *say* we’re scrapping the ‘Bedroom Tax’, we’re just going to make sure it doesn’t actually apply to anyone”.
To ensure all children learn about a wide range of religious and nonreligious world views, religious education will be included in the core curriculum; however we will give schools the freedom to set policy on whether to hold acts of collective worship, while ensuring any such acts are strictly optional.
Getting rid of the statutory requirement for worship in schools is a *big* deal, and a great thing.
We are the only party with a credible plan to deliver the extra £8 billion NHS leaders know our health service in England needs by 2020, with the appropriate boost to funding for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland too
Labour will only promise about a third of this. The Tories until last week were the same, and then suddenly said they’d put in the extra eight billion too, but without saying where they’d get it from.
That is why we will increase mental health spending in England’s NHS by £500m a year by 2016/17 – half of which we delivered in this year’s Budget – and provide the cash for similar investments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Desperately needed. There’s a lot of good wonkish mental health stuff in there.
Liberal Democrats are committed to repealing any parts of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 which make NHS services vulnerable to forced privatisation through international agreements on free markets in goods and services. We will end the role of the Competition and Markets Authority in health, making it clear that the needs of patients, fairness and access always come ahead of competition, and that good local NHS services do not have to be put out to tender. After determined negotiations, we now have a clear guarantee from the EU that member states’ rights to provide public services directly and not open them up to competition are explicitly enshrined in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and we will ensure this remains the case for TTIP and any future trade agreements.
Restrict the marketing of junk food to children, including restricting TV advertising before the 9pm watershed
Lots of environment stuff which sounds very nice but which I have no basis to evaluate the effectiveness of
Yay the environment. I sound dismissive, but this is actually probably the most important stuff in the manifesto in the very long term. I just have no reasonable way to evaluate any of it, other than “that sounds good”.
we have set an ambitious target of increasing the rate of house building to 300,000 a year.
Enable Local Authorities to…levy up to 200% Council Tax on second homes where they judge this to be appropriate.
Sounds fair to me.
Challenge gender stereotyping and early sexualisation, working with schools to promote positive body image and widespread understanding of sexual consent law, and break down outdated perceptions of gender appropriateness of particular academic subjects
Give legal rights and obligations to cohabiting couples in the event of relationship breakdown or one partner dying without a will.
Permit humanist weddings and opposite sex civil partnerships, and liberalise the rules about the location, timing and content of wedding ceremonies.
Support schools to tackle homophobic and transphobic bullying and discrimination, and to establish a tolerant and inclusive environment for all their pupils. We will remove schools’ exemption from the bar on harassment in these areas while protecting the right to teach about religious doctrine.
Promote international recognition of same sex marriages and civil partnerships as part of a comprehensive International LGBT Rights Strategy that supports the cause of decriminalising homosexuality in other countries.
Seek to pardon all those with historic convictions for consensual homosexual activity between adults.
Enhance the experience of all football fans by making homophobic chanting a criminal offence, like racist chanting.
Ask the Advisory Committee on Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs periodically to review rules around men who have sex with men donating blood to consider what restrictions remain necessary
All good stuff, apart from the football chant one, which I’m in two minds about, because I don’t like laws against speech but I also don’t like tens of thousands of people chanting homophobic hate speech. The rest is all great, thanks to the good work of LGBT+ Lib Dems.
(There’s a lot of stuff about racial and religious discrimination, but I’m not qualified to see if those policies are as good, as it’s not an area I know much about.)
Formally recognise British Sign Language as an official language of the United Kingdom.
Prohibit discrimination on the grounds of religion in the provision of public services.
Move to ‘name blank’ recruitment wherever possible in the public sector.
Introduce statutory public interest defences for exceptional cases where journalists may need to break the law (such as RIPA, the 2010 Bribery Act, and the 1998 Computer Misuse Act) to expose
corruption or other criminal acts.
Ensure judicial authorisation is required for the acquisition of communications data which might reveal journalists’ sources or other privileged communications, for any of the purposes allowed under RIPA; and allow journalists the opportunity to address the court before authorisation is granted, where this would not jeopardise the investigation.
Some much needed protection for journalists here.
To promote the independence of the media from political influence we will remove Ministers from any role in appointments to the BBC Trust or the Board of Ofcom.
To guarantee press freedom, we will pass a British ‘First Amendment’ law, to require the authorities and the courts to have regard to the importance of a free media in a democratic society.
Both obvious Good Things.
And a list of things from the freedoms and digital rights sections, without my comment because they’re obviously good (though they don’t go as far as I would — but then pretty much *no-one* would go as far as me):
Establish in legislation that the police and intelligence agencies should not obtain data on UK residents from foreign governments that it would not be legal to obtain in the UK under UK law.
Back a full judicial enquiry into complicity in torture if the current investigation by the Commons Intelligence and Security Committee investigation fails to get to truth.
End indefinite detention for immigration purposes.
Introduce restrictions on the indefinite use of police bail.
Require judicial authorisation for the use of undercover police officers to infiltrate alleged criminal groups.
Identify practical alternatives to the use of closed material procedures within the justice system, including the provisions of the 2013 Justice and Security Act, with the aim of restoring the principle of open justice.
Tighten the regulation of CCTV, with more powers for the Surveillance Camera Commissioner.
Extend the rules governing storage of DNA and fingerprints by public authorities to include all biometric data – like facial images.
Protect free speech by ensuring insulting words, jokes, and non-intentional acts, are not treated as criminal, and that social media communications are not treated more harshly than other media.
Prevent heavy-handed policing of demonstrations by tightly regulating the use of ‘kettling’.
Ban high-frequency Mosquito devices which discriminate against young people.
Strengthen safeguards to prevent pre-emptive arrests and misuse of pre-charge bail conditions to restrict civil liberties and stifle peaceful protest.
End the Ministerial veto on release of information under the Freedom of Information Act
Enshrine the principle that everyone has the right to control their own personal data, and that everyone should be able to view, correct, and (where appropriate and proportionate) delete their personal data, wherever it is held.
Forbid any public body from collecting, storing or processing personal data without statutory authority, and require any such legislation to be regularly reviewed.
Give increased powers and resources for the Information Commissioner and introduce custodial sentences for egregious breaches of the Data Protection Act.
Ensure privacy is protected to the same extent in telecoms and online as in the offline world. Public authorities should only invade an individual’s privacy where there is reasonable suspicion of criminal activity or where it is otherwise necessary and proportionate to do so in the public interest, and with appropriate oversight by the courts.
Uphold the right of individuals, businesses and public bodies to use strong encryption to protect their privacy and security online
The stuff on violence against women and sexual violence looks very good, especially:
Ensure teachers, social workers, police officers and health workers in areas where there is high prevalence of female genital mutilation or forced marriage are trained to help those at risk.
Require the teaching of sexual consent in schools as part of age-appropriate sex and relationships education.
These are hugely important areas, and currently not dealt with at all well.
We believe that a large prison population is a sign of failure to rehabilitate, not a sign of success. So our aim is to significantly reduce the prison population by using more effective alternative punishments and correcting offending behaviour.
It’s that our manifesto has sensible things like this — things that anyone who thinks for half a second would say are reasonable, but that go against the knee-jerk authoritarianism that’s been the norm in politics for as long as I’ve been paying attention to it — that convince me I’m in the right party.
Reform prisons so they become places of work, rehabilitation and learning, with offenders receiving an education and skills assessment within one week, starting a relevant course and programme of support within one month and able to complete courses on release
Yeah. Sensible, non-knee-jerk, policy.
Carry out an immediate review of civil Legal Aid, judicial review and court fees, in consultation with the judiciary, to ensure Legal Aid is available to all those who need it, that those of modest means can bring applications for judicial review of allegedly unlawful government action and that court and tribunal fees will not put justice beyond the reach of those who seek it. This will mean reversing any recent rises in up-front court fees that make justice unaffordable for many, and instead spreading the fee burden more fairly.
Translated “I can’t believe we let that idiot Grayling into Justice. We’d better undo the damage as quickly as possible”
Adopt the approach used in Portugal where those arrested for possession of drugs for personal use are diverted into treatment, education or civil penalties that do not attract a criminal record.
As a first step towards reforming the system, legislate to end the use of imprisonment for possession of drugs for personal use, diverting resources towards tackling organised drug crime instead.
Enable doctors to prescribe cannabis for medicinal use.
Put the Department of Health rather than the Home Office in charge of drug policy
The drugs policy doesn’t go nearly as far as I’d like, but again it’s such a relief to see it being talked about in ways that have anything at all to do with reality…
Introduce votes at age 16 for elections and referendums across the UK, and make it easier to register to vote in schools and
Reform the House of Lords with a proper democratic mandate, starting from the proposals in the 2012 Bill.
Reform our voting systems for elections to local government and Westminster to ensure more proportional representation. We will introduce the Single Transferable Vote for local government elections in England and for electing MPs across the UK. We will reduce the number of MPs but only as part of the introduction of a reformed, fair, voting system
And this is the single biggest reason why I’m a Lib Dem. We NEED proper electoral reform. I was worried that while this remained policy, it would quietly be dropped from the manifesto, but it’s still there. Councils are mentioned before Parliament, presumably because they’ll be more likely to be delivered in a coalition, but we’re trying for both.
Building on the Wright Committee recommendations of 2009, and experiences of Coalition, we will conduct a full review of Parliamentary procedures, which should formally recognise individual political parties not just Government and Opposition
This is something that is VERY necessary if multi-party governments are to become the norm.
We will deliver Home Rule for Scotland by implementing the
Smith Commission proposals in full in the first session of the next
Parliament. We will continue to make the case for powers currently
held at Westminster and Holyrood to be transferred directly to local
government where appropriate.
Proper devolution and Home Rule good. There’s lots of specifics about Welsh Home Rule as well, with a lot more powers granted to the Welsh Assembly, but I don’t know what most of them are. Same for Northern Ireland.
In some areas of England there is an even greater appetite for powers, but not every part of the country wants to move at the same speed and there cannot be a one-size-fits-all approach. We will therefore introduce Devolution on Demand, enabling even greater devolution of powers from Westminster to Councils or groups of Councils working together – for example to a Cornish Assembly
Proper devolution and Home Rule good.
Some of the wording under “Working for Peace and Security” appears to take a Blairite “liberal interventionist” stance, as many Labour supporters have spent much of the day saying on Twitter. I’m not especially happy with that, but I still think that overall the policies in that section (things like reducing the number of nuclear weapons) are more good than bad.
We will only support an agreement that upholds EU standards of consumer, employee and environmental protection, and allows us to determine how NHS services are provided.
I should certainly hope so!
(Most of the foreign policy stuff I’m not competent to comment on, like the environmental stuff; and like that, it’s probably more important than much of the rest).
Overall, much of the manifesto is sensible managerialism with which few people could disagree. There are also a couple of bits — but only a couple of bits — with which I very strongly disagree. But even though this is a manifesto designed to appeal to moderates who prize competence, rather than to radicals like myself, there’s plenty of good, strong, Liberalism in there.
Now we just have to get some good, strong, Liberal MPs elected to put as much of it as possible into practice.
“EVERY party says they’ll protect the environment, cut crime, protect the NHS, and stroke puppies. ”
That depends on the kind of puppy…
Sounds good, although it’s basically “we’ll leave this alone”.
Which, nine times out of ten is the wisest thing you can do. If only successive Education Ministers, for example, had followed this path.
Why the “Harumph” for the junk-food bit?
Because I don’t like restrictions on speech, because a lot of what gets called “junk food” is based on outdated nutritional science, and because campaigns against “junk food” are often coded campaigns either against fat people or against the poor. I don’t know the details of this policy past the single sentence in the manifesto, but I harumphed it on general principle.
OK, that all makes sense. Thanks.
I do reserve the right to withdraw the harumph if the detailed policy is sensible ;)
“Give legal rights and obligations to cohabiting couples in the event of relationship breakdown or one partner dying without a will. Permit […] opposite sex civil partnerships.”
What is the point of having (state-sanctioned) marriage or civil partnership is mere cohabitation is to yield these rights and obligations? What is the distinction between (state-sanctioned) marriage and civil partnership anyway? (I understand, and value the distinction of, religious marriage.)
Hope you’re enjoying your role as my pro-bono freelance political consultant :-)
I actually agree with the Lib Dem MPs who made the case to totally remove the state from marriage — apart from it greatly aiding in immigration cases.
The distinction between marriage and civil partnership is threefold. Firstly, there are a lot of tiny little bits of law that relate to marriage, not all of which have been amended to say “marriage or civil partnership” — the two states are very, very similar, but still distinct, legally.
Secondly, civil partnership is something that some people who are opposed to marriage because of the cultural baggage that comes with it are not opposed to in the same way.
And thirdly, civil partnership is in law currently *only* available to same-sex couples — which is the most important point and needs to be fixed, as it preserves a “separate but equal” distinction between types of couple.
Were it not for the immigration issue (and I’m personally for open borders, so that wouldn’t matter either…) my view would be that the state should get out of the marriage business altogether. As that’s impractical at present. my view is that there should be a range of options ranging from “full traditional marriage with a big wedding in a church” through to “if I’ve been living with someone for twenty years without getting married, and they die, I get to keep the house rather than their estranged kid who hates me getting it”, and those options should be open to any couple of whatever genders.
Pingback: Liberal Democrat manifesto on policing and security service powers | The Reinvigorated Programmer