Sci-Ence! Justice Leak!

Linkblogging For 25/01/10

Posted in comics, Doctor Who, linkblogging, politics by Andrew Hickey on January 25, 2010

I’ve spent the last week working on PEP!-related stuff, but I’ve now sent the final text out to all contributors. All that remains is to get any last-minute changes from them, and get it typeset, so I can start posting here again. Today’s only going to be a linkblog, because my wife is a Vikings fan and so I was awake until 3:30AM last night, but the rest of the week should be:
Tomorrow – Magical Mystery Tour
Wednesday – Book Club – The Constants Of Nature by John Barrow
Thursday – Book Club – Three Doctor Who Books From Big Finish
Friday – Comics (either Joe The Barbarian or Asterios Polyp)
Saturday – Spotify playlist
Sunday – PEP! Goes live.

Now those links:

Chris Bird takes a look at the big battle sequence in Crisis On Infinite Earths #12

Fred Clark has some advice for those protesting against the healthcare bill in the US (I *think* that last paragraph is the first time I’ve seen him swear in six years of reading his blog…)

Gavin R has switched to Ubuntu from Windows

Bobsy at the Mindless Ones hasn’t let not yet having read Joe The Barbarian stop him from reviewing it.

Marc Singer looks at Understanding Comics.

And Andrew Rilstone finally weighs in on the last episode of the Welsh series. He didn’t like it.

An Open Letter To My American Friends About The NHS

Posted in politics by Andrew Hickey on August 12, 2009

I did want today to write something about comics, and I’ve also got a playlist I want to post, but I felt compelled to write this after various news reports over the last couple of days. Unlike most of my writing (to which I retain the rights for various reasons, I’ve decided to license this piece as Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License because I want people to share this by whatever means. I’ve emailed the following to as many of my USian friends as I can think of and have valid email addresses for (and at least a dozen who it turns out I *don’t* have valid email addresses for, if the bounce messages are anything to go by…):

I am writing to you because you are a friend of mine, because of various statements that have been made by American politicians and journalists about Britain’s National Health Service.

I do not like to try to interfere in American politics, because how you run your country is your own business, but your politicians have been lying, and they have been lying about me and my wife and many of our friends and relatives, so I feel an obligation to set the record straight.

Many of your politicians and journalists have been saying things like “Ted Kennedy wouldn’t get treatment for his brain tumour in the UK because of his age” (a Republican senator called Chuck Grassley said that). Sarah Palin said that in the UK babies with Down’s Syndrome would have to go before a ‘death panel’. And so on. I’m sure you’ve all heard many claims like this yourself.

These claims are lies, pure and simple. They’re not ‘opinions’ that people can disagree about, they’re not things that can be debated, they’re not honest mistakes, they’re out-and-out lies.

Many of you will know that I worked for the NHS for about three years. Some of you will also know that Holly, my wife, still does. Do we strike you as people who would work for an organisation that killed people? Your politicians and journalists are accusing us of being knowing accomplices to murder.

According to the CIA World Factbook, British people live on average seven months longer than Americans. Now, that doesn’t say much about either country’s health-care system, especially when you take lifestyle differences into account, but what you *can* tell from that is that we’re not killing our old people – you don’t get a high life expectancy by killing people!

The tiny grain of truth in all of these lies is that in the NHS, an organisation called the National Institute for Clinical Excellence decides what treatments the NHS will and will not pay for. It does this by measuring how much extra healthy life a given treatment will give a patient, and how much it costs – just like your insurance company does. All healthcare systems have a budget – no system can spend an infinite amount of money, after all – so choices have to be made. The difference is, in your system, the choice is made based on whether you can afford to pay for it. Here, the choice is made based on how much you need it. If you’re 77 years old, like Ted Kennedy, and you have a brain tumour, you’ll get treatment so long as there’s a good chance of it working and giving you a few more years of good life. If there isn’t much chance of that, the government won’t pay it, that’s all. Just like your insurance company won’t pay for expensive treatments that won’t help you, neither will the British government.

And no-one is stopped from paying for treatment if it’s not funded by the NHS. People in Britain can still get private health insurance if they want to and can afford it, and can ask for treatments that the NHS don’t provide. Mostly they don’t, because it works for most people.

I know at least one homeless person who has been given treatment for cancer – and he was homeless before the treatments, not because of them – in Britain, if you’re sick you will get treated, no matter how much money you have. And no matter how old you are, or how disabled.

One American news source recently said that Professor Stephen Hawking would be allowed to die over here, because of his illness. In fact Prof. Hawking has lived in the UK all his life and has nothing but praise for his treatment by the NHS. Sarah Palin says people with Down’s Syndrome would be refused treatment – that would be news to the people with Down’s Syndrome I used to work with, many of whom had had heart operations on the NHS.

On average, people in the USA spend twice as much on healthcare as people in Britain – and more than any country in the world. Despite that, according to the World Health Organisation, the USA’s health system is 37th in the world, while the British one is 18th.

There are plenty of faults with the British health care system – and I hope that your legislators learn from them and get you a better system than we have – but it works. We do not kill old people. We do not kill disabled people. If we did, then Holly and I , instead of working for the NHS, would be fighting against it with every ounce of strength we have.

There are arguments that can be made against our system, just as there are arguments for it, and if you agree with those arguments then that’s fine – I have no intention to change your mind here. I am just trying to let you know that I am not an accessory to murder, and that anyone who says I am is a liar.

Tagged with: ,

Linkblogging for 09/08/09

Posted in comics, Doctor Who, linkblogging, politics by Andrew Hickey on August 9, 2009

Just a quick one today as I have an infection that’s swelled my tongue up to the size of my head and given me a migraine…

Big Finish have reduced the prices of a load of their Doctor Who spin-off series to a fiver – when you buy them you get a DRM-free MP3 download immediately and a CD through the post (post is free). The series involved are Bernice Summerfield (a companion from the books, the first story of which is written by Paul Cornell, who I know some of you like), Gallifrey (a series that starts out as an interesting SF political drama but gets all mystical-story-arc by the end, featuring both Romanas, Leela and both K9s), I, Davros (the life of Davros in the style of I, Claudius, sort of), Dalek Empire (you can guess what that one’s about) and Doctor Who Unbound (a ‘What If…’ series, featuring different actors playing the Doctor in different continuities).

If you’re going to buy one, I’d recommend either Masters Of War (an Unbound story featuring David Warner as the Doctor, with the Brigadier and Davros and an unusual take on the Daleks) or, one of my favourites, Deadline (in which a writer played by Derek Jacobi muses about how much better his life would have been had that TV series Doctor Who he’d worked on in the early 60s ever been made).

Eddie Campbell talks about why comics created as film pitches are so poor, and the difference between the meaning of a story and a recounting of its plot.

Alex reviews the Peter Davison Doctor Who story Kinda and Doctor Who And The Silurians.

Jim Jay talks about the Greek woman who supposedly set light to an English tourist’s genitals. After having just spent a week in a tourist-trap in Greece I can see exactly why she did it…

Sara at Orcinus is worried that the Republicans in the US are turning towards actual fascism.

And Costigan looks at the Home Office response to claims that ID cards can be cloned.

Thank God for that…

Posted in politics by Andrew Hickey on November 5, 2008

I was absolutely *convinced* – utterly, totally, convinced, that the Republicans were going to steal the US election again. At no point in the election did Obama have a *comfortable* lead in the polls – a lead great enough that it was outside the normal margin of error plus what could be convincingly put down to racism. Remember that Kerry’s lead in 2004 was usually around 5% (in July 2004 it got as high as 13% in some polls) – Obama’s never got much more than 6%. As Leonard Pierce put it over on Sadly, No , “Since my joint’s not in play, I can enjoy drinking all night without worrying about my fellow man, and put off suicide until tomorrow when I wake up and learn that America has remembered that Barack Obama is a negro.”

But somehow the people of the US have actually managed to make the right choice, and get the lesser of two evils into office.

I’m no great fan of Obama – he’s a moderate ‘centrist’ Democrat, which for any other Western country would make him extreme right-wing. He’s someone, after all, who wants the death penalty used for *more* crimes – hardly a truly liberal stance. He also reminds me rather too much of Tony Blair – the messianic fervour with which apparently rational people are treating him, the big grin, the relative lack of substantive commitments, the way that his supporters are far more radical than he is (one irritating trend I’ve seen is that bloggers talking about “what Obama *should* say” to whatever insane Republican campaign trick came up were almost always saying something more appropriate than anything Obama himself would say).

Obama has been used as the repository of everyone’s hopes and aspirations, and to be honest I don’t believe the man’s actually said or done enough to deserve it. I think we’re all in for a *LOT* of disappointment over the next few years.

That said, I am still extremely glad that Obama was elected at all. Not only because of the fact that he was clearly the better of the two candidates (and because his VP-elect isn’t totally, utterly, batshit insane) but because of the message it sends, that America isn’t scared of minorities any more. Not black people – clearly a lot still *are* scared of them, and there’s no reason the election of the first black President would necessarily be more radical than the election of the first Jewish Prime Minister (Disraeli) or the first female one – although it is of course extremely gratifying that a black man *can* become President now; but *intelligent* people.

This is the first time since at least Jimmy Carter that the American people have elected someone who is not only more intelligent than average, but is unafraid to show it. Clinton is hugely intelligent, of course, but he hid that behind the ‘Bubba’ persona; and whatever one’s assessment of Reagan and the Bushes as Presidents, none of them ever gave the impression of being hugely intelligent – or, indeed, of ever having read a book. (Maybe Bush Sr read one once, possibly…). Whether that impression is correct is another matter, of course, but up until now the American people have seemed for some reason to be scared of intelligence in their leaders.

Whatever his other qualities, Obama is clearly a very intelligent, articulate man – someone who talks in thoroughly thought-out, considered, *paragraphs*, and who actually has some knowledge of a variety of different subjects and *talks about them*. Under those circumstances, I can even forgive him not knowing the difference between Green Lantern and the Green Hornet (as in a recent speech reported on one of the comics blogs I read), or misusing the word ‘enormity’ as he did in his victory speech. He is clearly not someone who’s afraid of thought, or afraid of showing that he’s thought about things.

And given that he also appears to be a well-intentioned, decent human being, I think he’ll probably not make things too much worse. Which, after eight years of continual shock to the nervous system as Bush does ever-more-insane things, will be a welcome change. Only two more months of worrying that ‘Dubya’ will decide to drop nuclear bombs on Brazil as a joke, or will invade Canada for being all snooty and saying ‘aboot’, and then we’ll once again have a USA that is led by someone who is worthy of the American people – who are, in my experience, the disproof of the adage that a country gets the government it deserves.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 53 other followers