<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Beatles Mono Reviews 4 &#8211; A Hard Day&#8217;s Night (Part One)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewhickey.info/2009/10/07/the-beatles-mono-reviews-4-a-hard-days-night-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewhickey.info/2009/10/07/the-beatles-mono-reviews-4-a-hard-days-night-part-one/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on music, science, politics and comics. Mostly comics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:46:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pillock</title>
		<link>http://andrewhickey.info/2009/10/07/the-beatles-mono-reviews-4-a-hard-days-night-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-3983</link>
		<dc:creator>pillock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewhickey.info/?p=916#comment-3983</guid>
		<description>Wonderful choice of clip for your contention about Lennon&#039;s solipsism, HA!  I do think this post could very fruitfully be expanded into a Great Big Thing, even as abbreviated as it is...the idea that Lennon&#039;s concerns are adult concerns even as they are egocentric concerns is an interesting contrast to McCartney&#039;s realization about other people...which, let&#039;s face it, when it ends up in Wings makes for some &lt;i&gt;awfully&lt;/i&gt; arbitrary-sounding lyrical content, as though he had a great idea for a song (&lt;i&gt;many&lt;/i&gt; great ideas, of course) but could only follow his essentially-romantic nose toward what it might best be made to be &lt;i&gt;about&lt;/i&gt;.  But one thing for solipsism, it&#039;ll never leave you lacking for subject matter.

Of course as you say, it isn&#039;t as though Paul never wrote an &quot;I&quot;-based song (or even a song where the other person was essentially an object, Lord knows!)...and it isn&#039;t as though Lennon never wrote a song whose primary focus wasn&#039;t on himself...

But this is some pretty lucid business you&#039;ve got going on here, and I might as well tell you I&#039;m going to straight-up lift it for purposes of Thanksgiving-table conversation.

Also very much appreciate the Wagner comparison!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful choice of clip for your contention about Lennon&#8217;s solipsism, HA!  I do think this post could very fruitfully be expanded into a Great Big Thing, even as abbreviated as it is&#8230;the idea that Lennon&#8217;s concerns are adult concerns even as they are egocentric concerns is an interesting contrast to McCartney&#8217;s realization about other people&#8230;which, let&#8217;s face it, when it ends up in Wings makes for some <i>awfully</i> arbitrary-sounding lyrical content, as though he had a great idea for a song (<i>many</i> great ideas, of course) but could only follow his essentially-romantic nose toward what it might best be made to be <i>about</i>.  But one thing for solipsism, it&#8217;ll never leave you lacking for subject matter.</p>
<p>Of course as you say, it isn&#8217;t as though Paul never wrote an &#8220;I&#8221;-based song (or even a song where the other person was essentially an object, Lord knows!)&#8230;and it isn&#8217;t as though Lennon never wrote a song whose primary focus wasn&#8217;t on himself&#8230;</p>
<p>But this is some pretty lucid business you&#8217;ve got going on here, and I might as well tell you I&#8217;m going to straight-up lift it for purposes of Thanksgiving-table conversation.</p>
<p>Also very much appreciate the Wagner comparison!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
