<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Books You Should Read : Anathem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewhickey.info/2008/12/30/books-you-should-read-anathem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewhickey.info/2008/12/30/books-you-should-read-anathem/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on music, science, politics and comics. Mostly comics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:46:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BruceR</title>
		<link>http://andrewhickey.info/2008/12/30/books-you-should-read-anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>BruceR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewhickey.info/?p=330#comment-650</guid>
		<description>My experience with Anathem was as follows: about a week to read the first 200 pages, 2 days to read the last 700 pages, and 2 days to re-read the entire book. I had just finished re-reading &quot;Snow Crash&quot; for the first time in several years, and Anathem could not be more different, so it took a while for the world of Arbre to penetrate. (A short aside: Snow Crash just gets more relevant every time I read it - it will have to be reclassified as non-fiction pretty soon!) Anathem is certainly one of the most thought-provoking works of fiction that I&#039;ve read in a while, and although I could certainly quibble over some aspects of the plot, there&#039;s a whole lot to love about this book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience with Anathem was as follows: about a week to read the first 200 pages, 2 days to read the last 700 pages, and 2 days to re-read the entire book. I had just finished re-reading &#8220;Snow Crash&#8221; for the first time in several years, and Anathem could not be more different, so it took a while for the world of Arbre to penetrate. (A short aside: Snow Crash just gets more relevant every time I read it &#8211; it will have to be reclassified as non-fiction pretty soon!) Anathem is certainly one of the most thought-provoking works of fiction that I&#8217;ve read in a while, and although I could certainly quibble over some aspects of the plot, there&#8217;s a whole lot to love about this book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Hickey</title>
		<link>http://andrewhickey.info/2008/12/30/books-you-should-read-anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewhickey.info/?p=330#comment-570</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read a chunk since then. It gets better. It turns into a story about Hypertime... (don&#039;t worry, I&#039;m not &#039;spoiling&#039; anything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read a chunk since then. It gets better. It turns into a story about Hypertime&#8230; (don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;m not &#8216;spoiling&#8217; anything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://andrewhickey.info/2008/12/30/books-you-should-read-anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewhickey.info/?p=330#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Hh. I&#039;m at almost the exact same point as you, maybe about p.450 or so, coincidentally, and am surprised to find myself thrilling over a book largely about geometry. Fuck, if it&#039;s used to find spaceships, though... it&#039;s the Boy&#039;s Own booster I need to deal with Plato, Leibniz and them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hh. I&#8217;m at almost the exact same point as you, maybe about p.450 or so, coincidentally, and am surprised to find myself thrilling over a book largely about geometry. Fuck, if it&#8217;s used to find spaceships, though&#8230; it&#8217;s the Boy&#8217;s Own booster I need to deal with Plato, Leibniz and them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew J. Brady</title>
		<link>http://andrewhickey.info/2008/12/30/books-you-should-read-anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew J. Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewhickey.info/?p=330#comment-566</guid>
		<description>I agree about Anathem, and Stephenson in general; I really think he&#039;s one of the best living writers, and he never fails to astonish me with his books.  Anathem is just amazingly excellent, and I love pretty much everything about it.  Good reading.

Oh, and Dave, I definitely disagree about the &quot;filler&quot; aspect of the Baroque cycle; it&#039;s all a big, glorious concentration of Stephensonian descriptiveness, plotting, characters, and setpieces; I wouldn&#039;t have it any other way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about Anathem, and Stephenson in general; I really think he&#8217;s one of the best living writers, and he never fails to astonish me with his books.  Anathem is just amazingly excellent, and I love pretty much everything about it.  Good reading.</p>
<p>Oh, and Dave, I definitely disagree about the &#8220;filler&#8221; aspect of the Baroque cycle; it&#8217;s all a big, glorious concentration of Stephensonian descriptiveness, plotting, characters, and setpieces; I wouldn&#8217;t have it any other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Page</title>
		<link>http://andrewhickey.info/2008/12/30/books-you-should-read-anathem/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewhickey.info/?p=330#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested to read that; I&#039;ve finally got the energy to plough through the remaining volumes of the Baroque Trilogy, and while it&#039;s all very entertaining and diverting, I can&#039;t help but think that most of it is witty filler and that the trilogy would be better served condensed into one volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to read that; I&#8217;ve finally got the energy to plough through the remaining volumes of the Baroque Trilogy, and while it&#8217;s all very entertaining and diverting, I can&#8217;t help but think that most of it is witty filler and that the trilogy would be better served condensed into one volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
