Sci-Ence! Justice Leak!

Linkblogging for 17/04/14

Posted in Uncategorized by Andrew Hickey on April 17, 2014

Now that the house-moving stuff and the health stuff have settled down, and I’ve nearly finished the formatting-someone-else’s-ebook stuff, I’m planning to use much of the long weekend to build up a backlog of posts for here for the next few weeks. While you’re waiting for that, have some links:

Yahoo’s core business —, flickr, tumblr and the rest, every Yahoo! service anyone outside China knows about — is worth -$3.45 billion. Yes, that’s a minus sign.

Brad Hicks, one of my favourite bloggers, is posting again on a new site

The arrow of time is caused by quantum entanglement or, rather, they’re the same thing…

No, Easter is not about Ishtar

Slate Star Codex on the problem with the “skeptic” movement

And both Plok and Simon Bucher-Jones responded to the writing meme…

Tagged with:

Blog Tour Meme

Posted in Uncategorized by Andrew Hickey on April 8, 2014

Lawrence Burton, my friend and author of various very good things, tagged me in a “meme” for writers. I’m meant to have tagged other people privately, but unfortunately my limited net access for the last couple of weeks has precluded that. If you’re a writer and read this, consider yourself tagged if you want to be. Millennium has also done an entry in this.

1 What are you working on at the moment?

I have a few projects at various states of completion. The Faction Paradox novel, Head of State, is currently with Stuart at Obverse Books, who will be editing it. I suspect there’ll be at least one more (quick) round of rewrites to do on that. Other than that, I have four main projects that I’ll be getting back to over the next few weeks — a book on 60s music from LA, which is my priority as it’s been Kickstarted, a series of essays on Cerebus, which I hope to finish before November, a book on Liberalism which I want to get out in enough time before the next election, and How To Build Your Own Time Machine, a “young adult” (children’s) book. There are other projects, some of which I’ve already started, that will be done once those are off my plate, but those are the main priorities right now.

I’m also working on an opera with Plok, David Allison and others, and have some other musical projects I’m planning to work on as and when I have time.

2 How does your work differ from others of its genre?

It depends on the work. I don’t know to what extent the novel is actually different from anything else in its genre, because its genre is basically just “Faction Paradox” and there are so few examples of that that it’s hard to find a coherent genre identity. I think, though, that a general strength of my fiction is the ability to write in the voices of protagonists who are very different to me, and Head of State has many different narratorial voices — at one point there is, if I remember right, a stack of six unreliable narrators, of different levels of fictionality, telling part of the story. I don’t think that’s something that’s been done in any other FP books.

As for my non-fiction about music, I suppose the big difference is my authorial voice, Certainly both the people who really hate my work and the people who really love it seem to point to the same things — the rather sarcastic humour, the willingness to be dismissive about work that is only worth dismissal, the intrusion of my political views, and so on.

My other non-fiction — the essays about comics and science fiction — is I think sui generis. A couple of the other members of the Mindless Ones collective do something similar, and Andrew Rilstone, Millennium, and Lawrence Miles have a little overlap, but I don’t know of anyone else who does precisely that kind of thing.

3 Why do you write what you do?

Ninety percent of what I write is because I have to — because there is stuff I have to say that I *need* to get out. A story idea will arrive, or I’ll be angry about some political event, or I’ll notice a connection between two pieces of music, and I’ll have to get it out. I’m not very good at writing to briefs — as an example, when Phil Purser-Hallard asked me to pitch for one of his Tales of the City anthologies, I immediately came up with what I think was the best story idea I’ve ever had (that will be in Tales of the Great Detectives, out very soon from Obverse Books). On the other hand, he also asked me to pitch for another anthology, which required the use of a specific character, and a specific setting. It took me months to think of anything, and when I did it was possibly the poorest idea I’ve ever had,

The other ten percent of what I write is for more commercial reasons. If I have something to say about almost every Beach Boys song, or a Doctor Who story from almost every year, or whatever, I’ll find something to say about the other ones so I can turn those opinions into a book and make some money from them. I hope I do a good enough job on that that no-one can tell which bits were less inspired.

4 How does your writing process work?

It varies depending on project. For the music books, which are mostly chronological looks at a predetermined set of songs, I just start at the beginning, listen to each song, and write about it. I usually don’t have to do much research as such, as I have a very good memory and have read pretty much everything on the bands I write about, but I fact-check as I go.

For fiction, I like to sit down and start at the beginning, without an outline, just an idea of where I’m going, and work through to the end, then do a very light rewrite. Usually my rewriting consists of little more than fixing very obvious mistakes and inconsistencies — I write fairly clean copy for the most part — but sometimes it will be more radical (I rewrote the whole ending of my story for Tales of the Great Detectives at quite a late stage, as I’d completely muffed it on the first draft, now it’s one of the better bits, I think).

For the Faction Paradox novel, because I was a first-time novelist working on someone else’s intellectual property, I had to write to a chapter-by-chapter outline I submitted. That was a fun challenge, but it felt like walking in shoes that were two sizes too tight and made it take much longer than it otherwise would.

For my essays on SF and comics I like not even to have an idea where I’m going. The improvisatory nature of those — and particularly trying to improvise a whole book structure on the fly — is the fun thing about them. They do, of course, require some revision before the books are done, but the whole point is to try to get as complex and interesting a structure as I can without planning.

Linkblogging for 07/04/14

Posted in Uncategorized by Andrew Hickey on April 7, 2014

Firstly, my apologies for my lack of recent posts. Since this time last month I’ve attended Lib Dem conference, been laid low with pneumonia for two weeks, moved house, and proofread a five-hundred page book for Andrew Rilstone (and I’m still in the process of formatting his ebook, which I’m behind schedule with — if you’re one of his Kickstarter backers, it’s my fault, not his, that you haven’t got your ebooks yet). The next few weeks I plan to get as much written here as possible, because May is going to be ludicrously full again…

I’ll be back posting properly once I’ve got the ebook done (a day or two, I think), but for now, have links:

Amazingly, the Independent actually had a sensible piece for Autism Awareness Day

Charles Stross on why jobs are a bad thing

Leonard Pierce on geeks and “born this way” arguments

Peter Watts on Heinlein, oxytocin, and group selection

The inexplicable rise of open-plan offices Someone brought up open plan offices in the equalities consultation at conference, and I actually shouted “Yes!” — they’re hateful things, damaging to both health and “productivity”.

Scott Aaronson on promoting science for the right reasons A lot of what he talks about there actually also fits very well with political messaging.


Tagged with:

Not back yet due to @btcare incompetence

Posted in Uncategorized by Andrew Hickey on April 2, 2014

Despite us booking in a visit two weeks ago, and despite them having a five-hour timeslot in which to turn up (8AM-1PM), the engineer to connect my home phone and internet didn’t bother to turn up in that timeslot.
Holly has since discovered that there’s a fault on the line that needs fixing before the internet can be connected, and that “hopefully today or tomorrow” they’ll sort it out. They didn’t bother letting us know this, though, until she phoned up to find out where the technician she’d waited in for all day was.
If this *isn’t* sorted today, I shall be emailing BT’s chief executive tomorrow, as last time we had problems with them (this time last year, when they cut us off for a month because someone moved into the flat upstairs) no lower level of employee actually bothered to lift a finger to rectify the problem.
But given BT’s appaling uselessness, don’t expect me to be back any time soon. I can see this stretching for months just like last time, and it’s only the equal incompetence of TalkTalk and Virgin that prevent me from moving to them.
Were there to be a single *competent* phone company/ISP, they’d capture 99% of the market, guaranteed, within months of starting up…

New Mindless Ones Post On Cerebus

Posted in Uncategorized by Andrew Hickey on April 1, 2014

The first in a series. I wrote it last week, but there’ve been problems with the Mindless site. You might need to try to reload once or twice to see it.

Back properly tomorrow.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 149 other followers